{"id":241736,"date":"2020-03-16T12:00:16","date_gmt":"2020-03-16T11:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.npwj.org\/?p=241736"},"modified":"2023-04-07T16:59:11","modified_gmt":"2023-04-07T14:59:11","slug":"joint-statement-international-organisations-submit-that-the-icc-has-jurisdiction-to-investigate-war-crimes-in-palestine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.npwj.org\/it\/press-release\/joint-statement-international-organisations-submit-that-the-icc-has-jurisdiction-to-investigate-war-crimes-in-palestine\/","title":{"rendered":"JOINT STATEMENT: International organisations submit that the ICC has jurisdiction to investigate war crimes in Palestine"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n

Four international human rights organisations \u2013 the\u00a0International Federation for Human Rights<\/strong>\u00a0(FIDH),\u00a0No Peace Without Justice<\/strong>,\u00a0REDRESS<\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0Women\u2019s Initiatives for Gender Justice<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 submitted\u00a0observations<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0on 16 March 2020 to a panel of judges at the International Criminal Court on the Court\u2019s competence to investigate war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in the territory of Palestine: the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and Gaza.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

The organisations submit that:<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

(I) The Court has jurisdiction over Palestine on the basis of Palestine\u2019s status as a State Party to the Rome Statute, to which it acceded in January 2015. Since accession, Palestine has interacted with other States and the Court\u2019s organs as a State Party, and has been treated as such by the Court and other States Parties. Questions over Palestine\u2019s statehood beyond the purposes of the Court\u2019s Statute and its jurisdiction should not be considered.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

(2) The Court\u2019s competence to investigate allegations of war crimes includes the entire territory of Palestine, comprising the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and Gaza. This is established through numerous United Nations Security Council and General Assembly resolutions and authoritative decisions, including from the International Court of Justice. Furthermore, any finding to the contrary would contradict rights of Palestinians under international human rights law and prohibitions under international humanitarian law.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

(3) The mandate and raison d\u2019etre of the Court are important considerations when deciding this case. A number of parties are arguing before the Court that affirming territorial jurisdiction over Palestine could undermine peace negotiations. However, the Court is not called to determine the statehood of Palestine under international law; nor is it called to take into account political considerations when determining the scope of its jurisdiction. Instead, the Court should base its decision on the Rome Statute and other applicable treaties and principles of international law. As such, affirming jurisdiction in this case will contribute to accountability, justice, and the prevention of ongoing and future crimes, which is what the Court is mandated to deliver, and which are vital components for any negotiations aimed at sustainable peace.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

The organisations made their submissions in the context of a request from the\u00a0Prosecutor to the Chamber<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0on 22 January 2020, asking it to confirm the scope of the territory over which investigations into alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity can take place. On 20 February 2020, the Chamber\u00a0invited<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0the organisations, and a range of other stakeholders, to submit observations on the Prosecutor\u2019s request.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

 <\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n